FAQ
Questions & honest answers about Olivares AI
Practical answers for teams evaluating Olivares AI as ground truth for enterprise AI: what it is, what stays inside your perimeter, and where the product is intentionally honest about limits.
What is Olivares AI?
Olivares AI is a self-hosted, vendor-neutral platform for integrating, managing and securing enterprise AI on the infrastructure you already run. It discovers agents, sessions, models and MCP servers, then builds an access map of what each one can read or write. The goal is to give platform, security and operations teams ground truth they can use for policy, cost and evidence.
How is Olivares different from an AI gateway or LLM observability tool?
A gateway focuses on model calls: routing, keys, budgets, caching and sometimes content filters. LLM observability focuses on traces, spans and prompt-level debugging. Olivares sits around the estate instead, mapping agents to the resources they actually touch and comparing permitted access with observed behavior. Those tools can stay in place; Olivares adds the infrastructure-level governance and evidence layer beside them.
What does self-hosted or air-gapped mean if Claude is not self-hostable?
Claude inference is not self-hostable, so a Claude request still reaches Anthropic or a supported cloud provider account you configure. What is self-hosted is Olivares itself: discovery, access map, audit ledger, policy state and governance data run in your infrastructure. Air-gapped means that governance and observation layer can operate without calling home. For models you genuinely self-host, inference can stay local too.
Why Claude-first, and does that create lock-in?
Claude-first means the deepest product work is around Claude Code and the way enterprise teams operate it. The access map, identity, policy, FinOps and evidence layers are vendor-neutral and are designed around what agents touch, not one model vendor. Claude is the first-class integration surface, not a cage.
Does Olivares compete with Anthropic or resell Claude?
No. Olivares complements Claude; it does not replace it, resell it or broker a subscription credential. Your model relationship remains between you and the model provider. Olivares is the governance and observation layer around the agents and sessions that use those models.
Does my data leave our perimeter?
Olivares governance data stays in your perimeter: the access map, audit ledger, inventory and policy state live in your storage. The platform records relationships and outcomes rather than prompt payloads, result rows, secrets or personal data. There is no mandatory telemetry home. The honest exception is model inference itself: hosted models such as Claude still receive the requests you choose to send to them.
Can Olivares break production?
The discovery and access-map path is out of band. It reads audit logs, OpenTelemetry and source-native signals rather than sitting in every agent data path, so a collector failure degrades visibility rather than production traffic. Enforcement only applies where you deliberately connect a governed gate, such as a Claude Code hook or another provisioned actuation surface. Those gates are designed to fail closed rather than show a false green.
How far should we trust the access map?
Trust each edge exactly as far as its evidence says. The map distinguishes read from read/write only where the source can prove that distinction, and it carries confidence about attribution and coverage. If a shared service account hides the agent identity or a source cannot prove read versus write, the product marks that uncertainty instead of guessing. Clean evidence is actionable; unknown or approximate evidence is a prompt to improve instrumentation.
Is Olivares production-ready?
Olivares is pre-1.0 and in active development, and the public site labels the product experience as preview. Teams should evaluate it read-first, on non-critical environments or a controlled estate, before wiring it into important control paths. APIs and module surfaces can still change. That honesty is part of the product: a governance platform should not overstate what it can prove.
How is it licensed?
The self-hosted core is open under AGPL-3.0. The intent is that the complete self-hosted product is useful without a feature-capped community edition. A commercial license is available for organizations that need an AGPL exception for legal or distribution reasons. Connector and integration boundaries should be checked against the published repository at launch.
What does it cost?
You can self-host the AGPL product without paying Olivares for a feature unlock. Your operating costs are your own infrastructure and any model inference you choose to use through your provider accounts. Paid options are for commercial licensing and enterprise arrangements, not for making the core product functional.
How should a team evaluate it safely?
Start read-first: connect signals, inspect the access map and compare permitted with observed behavior before enabling enforcement. Treat early use as a design and coverage evaluation, not as your only safety net. When the map highlights uncertainty, improve identity propagation and audit sources before relying on that edge for a decision.